Authority Before Action as a Structural Constraint • Non-Action as a Valid Control Outcome
In complex institutional environments, it is increasingly common to generate coherent explanations of what occurred and why.
Explanation can improve understanding. It can reduce uncertainty about causal chains. It can make outcomes appear more consistent and defensible.
But explanation does not create permission. The ability to explain why something happened does not grant authority to act, nor does it determine whether action was legitimate.
Authority must exist prior to action. It must be established as mandate, delegation, and bounds that are applicable at the point where action is permitted or refused.
Where action occurs without prior authority, post-hoc review cannot repair the missing condition. Audit, review, and justification can describe what happened, but they cannot retroactively legitimise action that lacked permission when it occurred.
This is a structural constraint.
See also: Authority Before Action as a Structural Constraint · Non-Action as a Valid Control Outcome
Even coherent explanations do not justify action when authority or clarity is absent.
© Arqua Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.