Defines the Alignment Architecture as a three-layer model connecting Meaning, Execution, and Admissibility to preserve coherence in AI-mediated systems, and positions admissibility as the control boundary where consequence-bearing action must be permitted before it binds.
• How does meaning become action without losing coherence? • What architectural boundary prevents automation from binding consequence without admissibility? • How do meaning, execution intent, authority, and evidence remain connected at T=0? • How does alignment drift become execution risk?
Position Alignment Architecture as the bridge between Codex Resonance research lineage (coherence, meaning, lineage, trust, constraint) and Arqua’s execution-admissibility architecture, clarifying why admissibility is necessary in AI-mediated execution environments.
• Execution Admissibility Architecture • Architecture of Record • SCIA Runtime • Execution Passports • The Desynchronization of Authority • From Codex Resonance to Arqua
Alignment as the Foundation of Coherent Action in AI-Mediated Systems
Source page (HTML): The Alignment Architecture
© Arqua Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.