This paper develops the Execution Passport pattern as the minimal portable authority-state bundle that accompanies consequence-binding actions to the commit boundary (T=0) for SCIA Runtime validation. It explains why approvals and permissions are insufficient when authority decays under changing evidence, context, and state, and proposes passport-based admissibility as a reconstructable, expirable, and enforceable authority continuity mechanism.
• What must an Execution Passport carry to enable admissibility at T=0? • How does an Execution Passport differ from approval tokens, IAM permissions, and audit logs? • How is expiry, revocation, scope, and escalation represented? • How does the passport remain reconstructable after execution? • How do institutions govern passport issuance and validation?
Define the Execution Passport pattern as the portable authority-state bundle that must survive from decision to execution, and specify the minimum admissibility-carrying payload required for runtime validation at T=0.
• The Desynchronization of Authority • Execution Attribution Collapse • Governance Survivability and the Limits of Institutional Recomputation
How authority-state travels to the commit boundary
© Arqua Pty Ltd. All rights reserved.