Enterprise Insertion Patterns

“Enterprise insertion patterns describe where execution admissibility control must be placed inside existing enterprise environments so consequential actions cannot bind without admissibility resolving at T=0.”

What this section does

These patterns translate Execution Admissibility Architecture into architectural placement points. They show where consequence binds, where the T=0 boundary appears, what must be admissible, how Architecture of Record maps the surface, and how SCIA Runtime provides the reference architecture for admissibility enforcement.

What this section is not

These pages are not implementation guides, vendor configuration instructions, API specifications, platform integrations, compliance opinions, audit opinions, or product claims.

How to read a pattern

Each pattern answers:

What enterprise flow is involved?
Where does consequence bind?
What is the T=0 admissibility question?
What must be admissible?
What does AoR map?
What role does SCIA Runtime play?
What public outcome is produced?
What is explicitly out of scope?

Canonical pattern list

Delegated Authority Runtime Model Operational State Transition Boundary MCP Execution Boundary Customer Decisioning / Next-Best-Action Runtime Governance SAP RAP Execution Boundary Oracle P2P Commit Boundary Banking Replayability and Regulator Review

Boundary

These pages describe architectural placement patterns only. They do not disclose implementation methods, schemas, code, protocols, algorithms, runtime scoring, tuple structures, platform configuration, or proprietary Arqua methods.

Next step

Start with one high-consequence workflow. Use the Pre-Execution Pressure Test to identify where execution is currently uncontrolled, then use the relevant insertion pattern to describe where admissibility control must be placed.

Links: