Enterprise Bridges

Enterprise Bridges are partner-safe practice notes designed to help established governance communities understand how execution admissibility fits alongside existing enterprise disciplines. They are bridge pages for translation and alignment, not canonical Arqua definition pages.

Positioning

Most organisations govern decisions. Very few govern execution.

Arqua does not replace enterprise architecture, data governance, cloud-data governance, or modelling frameworks. It extends governance to the execution boundary: the moment execution becomes consequence-binding (T=0).

At T=0, the relevant question is whether execution remains admissible under current authority, evidence, context, constraints, and state.

Enterprise Bridges into Execution Admissibility Architecture

Purpose: Show that established enterprise disciplines provide bridge entry points into Arqua’s core architecture, without implying ownership, modification, certification, endorsement, or formal representation of any external framework.

Bridge pages in this section

Is not: Canonical definitions of Arqua’s system architecture, formal standards alignment, or claims of endorsement.

From Data Governance to Execution Admissibility

Bridge pages

Arqua in TOGAF-Aligned Enterprises

Representing Execution Admissibility in ArchiMate — coming soon (practice note).

How this connects to Arqua’s core architecture

Execution Admissibility Architecture

→ Architecture of Record

→ SCIA Runtime

→ Pre-Execution Pressure Test

Execution Admissibility Architecture (EAA) defines the invariant: no state transition without proven integrity at execution.
Architecture of Record (AoR) is the map of where consequence binds and where control must exist.
SCIA Runtime (Stateful Contextual Integrity Architecture) resolves admissibility at T=0 as an architectural runtime boundary (not a product, policy engine, rules engine, software module, system operation, or implementation claim).
Pre-Execution Pressure Test surfaces uncontrolled execution surfaces and evidence gaps at the execution boundary.

Call to action

Start with one high-consequence workflow. Identify where consequence binds. Then determine whether execution is currently assumed or proven.

Boundary note

These pages describe architectural alignment patterns. They do not assert certification, endorsement, partnership, affiliation, official framework extension, legal assurance, regulatory compliance, system operation, or implementation.

Request a Briefing